Yuta Tomida vs Yuhei Kono Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Kono and Tomida have closely matched second serve performances over the past six months, with Tomida slightly ahead, winning 43.33% of points compared to Kono's 40.53%.
• Analyzing return games, Tomida has a minor advantage, winning 41.51% of second serve return points to Kono's 41% and 26.79% of first serve returns to Kono's 25.23%.
• Under pressure, Tomida displays resilience, saving 50.58% of breakpoints compared to Kono's 39.56%, indicative for in-game scenarios.
• In the past year, Tomida shows a stronger overall performance, securing victories in 62.12% of matches, while Kono has won 50%.
• Is surface preference significant in predicting match outcomes? Indeed, both players excel on Hard courts, with Tomida holding a better win ratio of 59% compared to Kono's 44%.
• Tomida's participation in higher-level Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments and a 62.12% success rate provides an edge over Kono, who has a 51.43% record in the same event types.
• Direct head-to-head analysis shows Tomida dominant with one win against Kono, who is yet to secure a victory.
• In high-pressure tie-break scenarios, Tomida has shown better composure, winning the only tie-break played between them.
• Kono has competed against higher-ranked opponents on average over the past year, with a rank of 238.22, compared to Tomida's 281.21.
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Kono seems favored with a 70% success rate in such situations over the last year, whereas Tomida's rate stands at 46%.
• Tomida exhibits superior efficiency in converting breakpoints recently, with a conversion rate of 35.29% against Kono's 27.27%.

Editorial Prediction (September 3, 2025, UTC):

As we look at the upcoming tennis match between Kono and Tomida, several key statistics and performance indicators emerge as factors favoring Tomida. In recent form, Tomida excels slightly in return games and showcases better breakpoint-saving capabilities under pressure.

Over the past year, Tomida's overall winning percentage surpasses Kono's, providing a strong indication of superior form. Moreover, while both players prefer Hard courts, Tomida's record is significantly better than Kono's on this surface.

Historical head-to-head results solidify Tomida's advantage, having won their only previous encounter. This, combined with better tie-break performance and breakpoint conversion, suggests a competitive edge in critical moments.

Despite Kono's advantage in deciding set scenarios, based on these factual comparisons, Tomida is most likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match.